Friday, October 14, 2005

Scumbag losers kill big Saguaros in park



TUCSON -- Sometime Wednesday night some stupid low-lifes killed three giant Saguaro cactus and a big mesquite tree at the northside Rillito River Park, with an axe recently bought at a local Wal-Mart.

Police say they likely won't catch anyone, but how hard will they really try to solve this felony crime? Cops should work with Wal-Mart to try to determine who bought the axe. That may lead them to the killer. Will Wal-Mart cooperate?

America's current hostile anti-conservation president and congress may have helped empower the vandals in thinking destruction of nature is OK. It is not, and whoever did it will suffer eventually, either in jail or at the hands of god.

A $3000+ reward is offered to anyone who provides information leading to an arrest and conviction in this horrible crime. Call 88-crime or 623.5252 x306 with any info, and if you ever see anyone hacking a saguaro, kick his ass.

11 comments:

LiberalismIsAMentalDisorder said...

You have GOT to be kidding me....you ACTUALLY link this to Bush? Are you REALLY that ignorant?

You can be rest assured that the conservatives in this country are JUST as concerned with environmental issues as is the moonbat left.

I cant believe how far your battiness will go to blame this on the president.

DRP said...

Mental Disorder -- Glad to hear you are a conservationists, many true conservatives are.

I am not blaming Bush, but his anti-conservation views and agenda can influence this type of destructive vandalism toward nature.

When some people see that the president doesn't respect nature, they are less likely to as well.

FYI, I am an independent, not a dem, not 'left' on all issues, and hardly a 'liberal'.

LiberalismIsAMentalDisorder said...

"When some people see that the president doesn't respect nature, they are less likely to as well."

So is that the excuse liberals are using for their pain they caused during the 8 years of terror viva Clinton?

"FYI, I am an independent, not a dem, not 'left' on all issues, and hardly a 'liberal'. "

Fair enough and my bad for assigning a label to you before knowing your stance...point is taken

shrimplate said...

Eight years of record government surpluses, relative peace, economic prosperity, and some blame Clinton for terror that ocurred on Bush's watch?! That's screwed up.

How many of our soldiers came home dead or wounded under Clinton, compared to the steady stream of casualties Bush produces?

And it was Bush that ignored the warnings of the 9/11 attacks. When Bush took office, Clinton told him his biggest problem was going to be Bin Laden. Later Bush took a month-long vacation after ignoring the warnings that specified plane attacks.

Bush has been terrible on enviromental issues. Period. He's a hero to the sick low-lifes that cut down those magnificent cactuses.

As long as "conservatives" align themselves with Bush, that are absolutely NOT friends of the enviroment.

Jeneiene Schaffer said...

My concern as a conservationist with your blog is the violent-type attitude it takes--'kicking ass' is not my preferred approach to this kind of environmental destruction. Neither is name calling.

I agree this is very very bad and can be linked to an administration that is blatanly callous towards the environment, but your approach, Daniel, is much more likely to make people react to your anger rather than to ponder and take action towards this issue.

Is your desire to change minds and bring about awareness or to piss folks off? You can't have both and be an effective champion of the environment.

LiberalismIsAMentalDisorder said...

"Eight years of record government surpluses, relative peace, economic prosperity, and some blame Clinton for terror that ocurred on Bush's watch?! That's screwed up."

No its called calling someone to task for their actions...Clinton had 2 YEARS to respond to the able danger situation..Bush had 9 months. Who is more culpable?

"How many of our soldiers came home dead or wounded under Clinton, compared to the steady stream of casualties Bush produces?"

If Clinton had done his job, it wouldnt be an issue right now..would it?

"And it was Bush that ignored the warnings of the 9/11 attacks. When Bush took office, Clinton told him his biggest problem was going to be Bin Laden. Later Bush took a month-long vacation after ignoring the warnings that specified plane attacks."

Oh I am sorry...Clinton has people who can handle things while he is on vacation but Bush doesnt? Maybe Clinton had better communication to handle things and Bush doesnt have that same communication abilities?

"Bush has been terrible on enviromental issues. Period. He's a hero to the sick low-lifes that cut down those magnificent cactuses."

Prove it moonbat...your mission is to hunt these people down and ask them that question, "Is Bush your hero?" I doubt that politics even played a role in this desecration of these noble plants, I would be more inclined to say that it was some kids who were bored.

"As long as "conservatives" align themselves with Bush, that are absolutely NOT friends of the enviroment. "

HAH..now there is a statement. So you say, without knowing me, that I am not environmentally friendly? Prove it..prove your baseless lies and false allegations moonbat.

Take off your tinfoil I hate bush hat and think with the brains that GOD gave you for a minute..will ya?

Anonymous said...

While some of the Al Queda terrorists trained to be pilots under Clinton's watch, to blame him for what transpired nine months later seems to be stretching reality.
Clinton managed to balance the budget, get the government out of the red, and not kill too many of our servicemen - without all of these achievements dubya would not have been able to do what he has, or to mess things up as much as he has, and for what? Iraq will not be a democracy even if we force feed Iraqis ballots and present them with candidates. Meanwhile Al Queda is STILL thinking up clever ways to kill and maim the infidels.

Anonymous said...

Throughout his tenure, dubya and the Republicans in the Congress and the Senate have taken every opportunity possible to find ways to make life easier for business. To do that, the environment has been sacrificed. Take pictures now, because if these creeps have their way, the government will stay in the hands of the Republicans, the land of the nation will be bulldozed, mined, dumped on, polluted, and otherwise trashed. Those guys haven't connected the dots yet though. Maybe when it's too late they'll realize.

Anonymous said...

Daniel,
I can see your anger with some assholes who would dare cut down our beautiful cacti. It probably was some bored teenagers.However, I am going to have to disagree with you and your wife on the Bush administration connection. If your looking to blame anyone why not blame the parents? Even if these individuals are adults.....respect is taught at home, and furthermore, so is terrorism. One man ( and his administration) cannot create All of this. People only know what they are taught.... if they are taught not to respect anything, how do you expect tolerence for our enviroment or the inhabitants? Love your blog site.......... keeps us all communicating, and thinking of new ideas to teach others.

shrimplate said...

Daniel, you lucky bastard, you have a troll.
Cool. I am like so totally envious, batdude.

Kiva said...

I think it's less about Bush and more about the growing sickness in the white community, one addicted to violence and hatred.

What? If they were black or Latino, you know their race would be an issue...

Your troll is amusing but ineffective. Protest Warriors are a pretty pathetic bunch, and those who hang on Michael Savage's every word are simply disconnected from reality.

As for the violence, well, I see you sitting down at your computer expressing outrage -- I don't see you out beating the crap out of anyone. I'd rather have your strong words of anger than reading you meekly sitting by, dispassionately reporting. Nobody really thinks you're going to lynch those two assholes.